Welcome to Nofinity

This transcript analyzes the departures of Ethereum's co-founders and the broader talent drain from the ecosystem, drawing surprising conclusions.

Background: Ethereum was founded a decade ago by eight co-founders. Most left because they considered Ethereum too slow, centralized, or compromised. Prominent examples are Charles Hoskinson (founder of Cardano) and Gavin Wood (founder of Polkadot).

The Departures and Their Motivations:

• Charles Hoskinson: Wanted Ethereum to become a for-profit company with VC funding and professional management. Vitalik Buterin pushed for a nonprofit foundation. Hoskinson lost the vote and left. He built Cardano around peer-reviewed academic research and formal verification.
• Gavin Wood: As the technical core behind Ethereum's Yellow Paper and inventor of Solidity, he viewed Ethereum's architecture as a “dead end.” Instead of patching it with Layer 2 solutions, he designed Polkadot as a network of specialized chains sharing security.

The Stark Numbers:

• Market Cap: Ethereum ($198.8B) is 37x larger than Cardano ($5B) and 134x larger than Polkadot (~$1.4B).
• Price Performance from ATH: Ethereum -67%, Cardano -94%, Polkadot -98.4%.
• Developer Activity: Ethereum has ~3,621 full-time developers, Cardano ~276, Polkadot ~450–500.
• Total Value Locked (TVL): Ethereum dominates with tens of billions, while Cardano ($85–142M) and Polkadot (~$81M) lag far behind.

The Deeper Analysis: The departures set a pattern: more developers founded their own chains, claiming “Ethereum is broken, our solution is better.” This led to a massive misallocation of talent. According to CoinGecko, 53% of all tokens ever listed are now dead, with 11.66 million failed projects in 2025 alone. Weekly crypto code commits dropped 75%, and active developers 56%.

But: Leaving Also Had Positive Outcomes:

1. Competition Forced Ethereum to Improve: Pressure from energy-efficient chains like Cardano accelerated the transition to Proof-of-Stake (The Merge), cutting energy use by 99.95%. High fees from Solana drove the introduction of EIP-4844 (Blob Transactions).
2. Innovations Ethereum Did Not Deliver: Gavin Wood pioneered shared security via Parachains and built the Substrate toolkit. Charles Hoskinson brought formal verification and real-world use cases (e.g., digital identities for 5 million students in Ethiopia).
3. Sovereignty: Both founders gained full control over their roadmaps without needing foundation approval.

The Irony: Hoskinson and Wood were right about Ethereum's problems, but their solutions failed to capture enough network effects and liquidity. Crypto ultimately rewards network effects and liquidity over technical purity. The developer building a better mousetrap loses to the one building where the mice already are.

Current Example: The recent cuts at the Ethereum Foundation (20% staff reduction, 40% budget cut) have led former EF researchers to spin up ETH Labs – an independent organization tackling the same issues but remaining within the Ethereum ecosystem. This time, the lesson is: “Don't fight the network, build on it.”

Final Question: Was the build-your-own-chain decade a heroic act of sovereignty that forced Ethereum to evolve? Or was it the largest misallocation of brilliant minds in crypto history?

Summary follows...

Summary follows...

Why Heating is Getting More Expensive (And What You Can Do About It)

• Gas price increase: The gas price has risen by two and a half times since January 2025.
• Main reason: The conflict in Iran and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a quarter of the world's shipped oil and a fifth of its liquefied natural gas (LNG) passes.
• Global impact: Although Germany is hardly directly affected, global market prices are rising for everyone.
• Gas storage: The targeted fill level of 80% before winter is not expected to be reached.

Important: The average gas price is falling temporarily for existing customers because utilities purchased cheaply and the gas storage levy was dropped. However, new customer tariffs are over a third more expensive. Price increases of 10-20% are expected for existing customers at the turn of the year.

• Network charges: Make up about one-fifth of the gas price and have risen by 10%.
• CO₂ price: Was 55 € per ton in 2025, currently between 55 and 65 € per ton in 2026.

Free & Easy Tips

1. Bleed your radiators: Especially important on upper floors. Air in the system reduces efficiency. Easily done with a radiator key from a hardware store.
2. Ventilate properly: Open windows wide several times a day instead of leaving them tilted constantly. A hygrometer helps monitor humidity and prevent mold.
3. Heat strategically: Every degree you lower the thermostat saves roughly 6% heating energy. Heat rooms according to their use (see recommendations from the German Environment Agency).
4. Circulate the air (with high ceilings): A fan on a low setting distributes warm air more effectively in the room.
5. Close stairwell and apartment doors: Prevents cold drafts and heat loss.

Tips with a Small Budget & Effort

6. Seal windows and doors: Check for drafts (e.g., with a strip of paper) and seal them with draft excluder tape from a hardware store. Savings: approx. 13 € per window per year.
7. Use a low-flow shower head: Reduces hot water consumption (approx. 12% of energy use) and saves money.

Financial & Strategic Tips

8. Secure current prices: If you have your own gas contract, switch to a tariff with a price guarantee to lock in the current rate for a year.
9. Check your utility bill!
   • Deadline: Your landlord must present the bill for 2025 by Dec 31, 2026. If it is late (due to their fault), you don't have to pay the balance.
   • Apportionment: Check if costs are distributed fairly.
   • Disallowed costs: Repair costs, bank charges, or postage cannot be passed on by the landlord.
   • Right to reduce payment: If heating costs are not billed based on consumption, you can reduce your share by 15%.
10. Adjust monthly advance payments: Increase your monthly payments or build a small reserve in a savings account to avoid unexpected large bills.

You are not helpless against the price increases. With the tips mentioned alone, an average of 465 € per year per apartment can be saved. Act now, because your consumption this winter will determine the amount of your additional payment in 2027/2028.

Further Information:

• The full interview with energy economist Malte Küper is available on the Finanzus podcast.
• A detailed guide on checking your utility bill is available in the newsletter.

This video presents a refined brewing method for the Moka pot (stovetop espresso maker), based on modern coffee science and the physics of the device. It aims to improve the traditional technique without losing its essence. Key points:

• Water temperature: Start with room temperature water (exception: stainless steel Moka → ca. 50 °C). This prolongs extraction and gently releases volatile aromas at 50‑60 °C.
• Grind size: Use a medium‑coarse to coarse grind (similar to a coarse V60). Finer grinds create too much pressure and push temperatures above 110 °C – harming flavor.
• Dosage & ratio: Fill the basket level (not heaped). Water in the base just below the valve. A ratio of about 1:5 (water:coffee) in the base yields roughly 1:3 in the cup.
• Aeropress filter: A paper filter on top of the coffee bed produces clearer coffee and removes sediment.
• Active flow control: Once coffee emerges, briefly lift the pot from the heat or lower the heat to slow flow to about 1 gram per second. This keeps temperature lower and extraction even.
• Avoid the Stromboli effect: Stop brewing before heavy sputtering (air bubbles in the riser tube). The final sputtering often adds bitterness and leathery notes – better to discard it.
• Adjust aftertaste: If the Moka tastes too sour or intense, dilute with hot water. This reduces perceived acidity and unfolds aromas.

Conclusion: The classic Moka pot can produce exceptional coffee if you actively control temperature, start with cool water, and avoid over‑fine grinding. This technique requires attention but rewards you with a much better cup – even with light roasts.

Summary: Compak Fino – Single-Dosing Grinder with Character

The Compak Fino is a Spanish single-dosing grinder with a 63 mm conical burr set. It comes in two versions: with scale (approx. €790) and without scale (approx. €599). The scale version also includes LED lighting.

• Principle: Weigh beans before grinding, add to grinder, and aim for minimal retention.
• Retention is phenomenal low – only 0.1 g in our test – one of the best values ever measured.
• The built-in scale shows output weight, but is considered not essential. An external scale for pre-weighing is sufficient.

• Speed: 18 g in about 15 seconds (360 RPM) – not the fastest, but acceptable.
• Noise: Only 78 decibels while grinding – very quiet for a grinder.

• Excellent dial: Fine markings allow precise adjustments. One line changes extraction time by 1–2 seconds.
• Repeatability is not perfect: returning to a previous setting can cause 4–5 seconds deviation. Tip: always approach from the same direction (e.g., from coarse).

• Conical burrs produce a relatively narrow main peak – comparable to the Niche, but slightly cleaner.
• Best suited for: medium to dark roasts. Delivers full-bodied, sweet espresso with well-integrated acidity. Light roasts are possible but less clear.
• The grinder is easygoing and great for exploring different coffees.

• Magnetic chute is removable. Burr chamber accessible with tools (hex screw).
• Anti-popcorning lid prevents beans from jumping.
• Regular cleaning: once a month (more often for dark roasts).
• Minimal static; the heavy dosing cup (250 g) stays put, but coffee should be fluffed after tapping.

The Compak Fino is a high-quality, durable entry-level grinder. It is quiet, precise, and delivers balanced flavor. The premium for the scale seems unjustified – the version without the scale is the smarter buy.

In short: Slow, quiet, almost zero retention – a recommended single-dosing grinder.

The video by The Coin Bureau explains the profound shift in the crypto industry: from speculative ICOs to protocols that generate actual revenue. The focus is on the question that now defines every token: What does this protocol actually do, and who pays for it?

The ICO Era: Stories over Substance

• 2017: A whitepaper, a logo, and a Telegram group were enough to raise millions – without a product or testnet.
• ICOs raised over $20 billion, but four out of five projects turned out to be scams or failed.
• Regulatory wave: The SEC declared DAO tokens as securities, China banned ICOs, and Telegram had to return funds.

DeFi Summer 2020: Activity Yes, But No Value Creation

• Liquidity Mining: Protocols like Compound lured users with freshly minted tokens (e.g., COMP) – essentially “renting” users.
• SushiSwap pulled over $1 billion from Uniswap by offering incentives.
• Core problem: Even the top protocols (Uniswap, Aave, Compound) didn’t pass fees to token holders – only governance rights, no revenue share.

The 2022 Collapse: Returns Without a Source

• Terra/LUNA offered 20% yields on UST – the peg collapsed, wiping out billions.
• Celsius froze withdrawals, FTX collapsed – in all cases, there was no real revenue source.
• Lesson: The question “Where does the yield come from?” became central.

Today: Protocols with Real Business Models

• Stablecoins: Tether (net profit $1.5B in Q2 2024) and Circle ($668M) invest in US treasuries and keep the interest – an extremely profitable model.
• Tokenization of RWAs: BlackRock’s BUIDL fund and Ondo list tokenized stocks and ETFs – bringing traditional financial products onto the blockchain.
• Hyperliquid as a pioneer: This perp DEX generated $429M in revenue (Jan–Sep) through fees, with up to 99% going to an Assistance Fund that buys and burns HYPE tokens. Additionally, 90% of USDC reserve yields feed buybacks.
• Fee Switches: Uniswap, Aave, Jupiter, and Sky introduce fee mechanisms that pass revenue to token holders – a paradigm shift.

Conclusion: The Best Product Wins

• Institutional investors now understand dashboards with fees, reserves, and buyback programs – this aligns with traditional finance logic (revenue, reserves, capital returns).
• Competition: In 2017, the best marketing won; in 2021, the most generous token emissions; today, the best product with real revenue wins.
• Question to viewers: Is revenue the only criterion? Or do story-driven projects still have a chance?