
Fastest Horse? 🐎🚀 SOL vs NEAR vs ETH, Quantum Dilution, China + Gold vs BTC
In this Sunday Q&A session, the central question is: What is the fastest horse? – i.e., the best investment opportunity until 2032. The host answers community questions about Bitcoin vs. SpaceX, the potential Tesla/SpaceX merger, Solana vs. NEAR vs. Ethereum, quantum stocks, and China's gold purchases.
Bitcoin: Hold or diversify?- Bitcoin remains an option, but don't put all your eggs in one basket. Current drawdowns at -35 % are much shallower than previous bear markets (85 %, 83 %, 76 %).
- JP Morgan names Bitcoin the best long-term asset but expects only 10 % annual returns – that would lead to a price of about $212,000 by 2036.
- Taxes should not prevent you from switching assets. Long-term capital gains taxes are usually manageable.
- SpaceX is growing extremely fast, especially through its data center business (Elon Web Services).
- Model estimates: Just from compute alone, SpaceX could reach $825 per share by 2031, and in optimistic scenarios up to $3,965.
- Comparison: A SpaceX target of $527 by 2028 would be equivalent to a Bitcoin price of $296,000. The host believes SpaceX is far more likely to hit its target.
- Bottom line: SpaceX is currently the faster horse – especially thanks to the AI boom.
- The expected merger premium is 30–40 % (Wall Street leans toward 30 %).
- For a $1 million portfolio by 2032, you need approximately 323 Tesla shares or 646 SpaceX shares.
- The merger lowers the requirement: At a 3x exchange ratio, only 215 Tesla shares would be needed – synergies make the package more efficient.
- If you already hold 85 % Tesla + 20 % SpaceX, you'd be at 146 % of your goal after the merger.
- Solana is the clear winner:
- TVL: 27x higher than NEAR
- Daily fees: ~$561,000 vs. $3,700 (Solana vs. NEAR)
- Daily users: 4.6 million vs. 63,000
- 94.5 % of all AI agent transactions run on Solana
- NEAR is a "pass-through station" for stablecoin transfers (mainly Tether) – no real stickiness, lots of marketing buzzwords.
- Ethereum is losing users, while Solana generated more than 3x its revenue over the last 30 days.
- Beware of dilution: IonQ (91 %) and Rigetti (94 %) are heavily diluted – "death by dilution."
- Rigetti is extremely expensive at 288x revenue; IonQ is much cheaper at 50x and growing strongly (+287 % YoY).
- The thesis that Google might acquire them is weak – Google is already a leader in quantum computing.
- If anything, IonQ is the better speculative choice.
- China has been buying gold for 23 consecutive months – without those purchases, the gold price would be significantly lower.
- The US dollar remains king (≈56.7 % of reserves) but is losing ground; in SWIFT payments, it dropped below 50 % for the first time.
- Bitcoin does not directly benefit from China's gold purchases. A potential win could come if AI creates new millionaires who want to diversify into Bitcoin.
- In the AI race between the USA and China, chip makers like TSMC and infrastructure players like SpaceX are the safer winners.
- Never borrow money to speculate! A 40 % loss requires almost 75 % gain just to break even.
- For AI cooling (Vertiv, Bloom Energy): Better to invest in the services built on top of the infrastructure, not the cable/cooling providers.
- Key message: Synergies and growth beat mere narratives.





